Primary Readiness / Adoption Attributes
|
Technology Knowledge/Learning
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Thorough research to understand technology to be implemented
|
|
Stakeholders in organization have conducted research about the technology to be adopted and understand the
requirements, scope, and costs
|
|
|
| Prior exposure / learning for the technology |
|
Stakeholders in organization have been exposed to similar technologies - this is not a brand new technology
with no familiarity
|
|
|
|
|
Ease of access/use
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Ease of access for the technology
|
|
Evidence exists through research and exposure that the technology will be easily accessed by and available to end users
|
|
|
|
Ease of use of the technology
|
|
Evidence exists through research and exposure that the technology will be easy to use for the anticipated audience and technology staff
|
|
|
|
|
Org/People Support Needs
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Technical support for the adopted technology
|
|
Technical support is available to end users and technical staff for the technology
|
|
|
|
Training of end users
|
|
There is a plan, resources, and instructors to execute end user training at the time of implementation
|
|
|
|
Building processes to support the new technology
|
|
There is a team and/or responsible party designated to build processes and resources to support the technology
|
|
|
|
Reliability of technology
|
|
Evidence exists through research and exposure that the technology will reliable in the environment
|
|
|
|
Extensive communication with stakeholders
|
|
There is a plan, resources, and identified individuals to communicate with stakeholders
|
|
|
|
Ongoing funding
|
|
There is identified funding to support the implementation and ongoing maintenance of the technology
|
|
|
|
Willingness to try new technologies
|
|
Evidence exists through communication, focus groups, or surveys that end users are willing to try the new technology
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Planning
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Technology documentation
|
|
There is a team and/or responsible party designated to write and maintain technology documentation to support the technology
|
|
|
|
Technology training
|
|
There is a team and/or responsible party designated to deliver and maintain ongoing technology training to support the technology
|
|
|
|
Annual planning for capital investments
|
|
There is a defined process to annually request and receive funding for innovative projects
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Access
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Access to tech support for the technology
|
|
There is a plan and funding for IT staff and end users to access tech support for the technology
|
|
|
|
Availability of technology to end users
|
|
The technology is widely available to end users who can benefit from the product
|
|
|
|
Regular updates to technology (to keep current and viable)
|
|
Evidence exists and funding is available to maintain regular updates to the technology
|
|
|
|
|
Intentional Awareness and Involvement
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Technology campaigns to increase awareness of new technologies
|
|
Technology campaigns were conducted prior to technology implementation
|
|
|
|
Presentations shared with college community
|
|
Technology presentations were conducted prior to technology implementation
|
|
|
|
Peer institution comparisons of technology
|
|
Technology presentations were conducted prior to technology implementation presentations were conducted prior to technology implementation
|
|
|
|
Needs analyses for technology innovations
|
|
Needs analyses were conducted prior to technology implementation
|
|
|
|
Communication to college stakeholders
|
|
Communication about the product and opportunities for stakeholder input were provided prior to technology implementation
|
|
|
Primary Readiness / Adoption Score
|
0
|
Ancillary Project Considerations
|
Pre-implementation activities
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Demonstrations of products
|
|
Technology demonstrations were conducted prior to technology implementation
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship of technology projects
|
|
An identified sponsor for the technology is identified and known priot to implementation
|
|
|
|
Project management
|
|
An identified project manager and/or team is in place early on in the project to support the implementation
|
|
|
|
Raising awareness of technology resources
|
|
There is a project manager or sponsor making stakeholders aware of technology resources early in the project
|
|
|
|
Communication with stakeholders
|
|
There is a communication plan for the implementation and a responsible party is identified
|
|
|
|
|
Perceptions of technology
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Viable technology solution
|
|
There is evidence through research the technology is technically robust/stable in a similar environment
|
|
|
|
Extensive communication about the technology project
|
|
Frequent communications are planned to keep stakeholders apprised
|
|
|
|
An identified owner or sponsor of the technology to ensure success
|
|
The identified owner/sponsor is aware of and able to execute their responsibilities to ensure project success
|
|
|
|
Lifecycle planning for technology replacement
|
|
There is a plan and funding in place to replace and support infrastructure to suppor the technology
|
|
|
|
Technologically sound IT staff
|
|
IT staff are prepared, knowledgeable, and trained to support the technology
|
|
|
|
Executive-level commitment to technology innovation
|
|
There is executive-level commitment to the project in the form of funding, communication, and decision-making
|
|
|
|
Ongoing technology support
|
|
There are resources, training, and funding for ongoing technology support
|
|
|
|
Campus-wide stakeholder engagement
|
|
The project manager or sponsor has evidence of campus-wide stakeholder engagement - focus groups, surveys, advisory committees
|
|
|
|
End user willingness to learn technology
|
|
There is evidence that end users are willing to change and adopt the technology
|
|
|
|
Convenience of the technology for staff
|
|
There is evidence that convenience of the technology is accounted for in the project - the technology is easily accessed and intuitive
|
|
|
|
|
Support for technology
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Infrastructure to support new technologies
|
|
Infrastructure is and functional and available to support the implementation
|
|
|
|
Proper funding for the technology
|
|
Funding is known and available to support the implementation - short and long-term
|
|
|
|
Skilled project management team
|
|
The project management team are trained and knowledgeable of project management principles
|
|
|
|
|
End user access/training
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Accessibility of the technology to end users
|
|
Accessibility, ADA, and security checks have been planned for and completed by end users prior to implementation
|
|
|
|
End user training and/or professional development for the technology
|
|
Technology training is established for both end users and IT staff; if certifications are required, this is planned in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration with Stakeholders
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Staff working collaboratively with IT
|
|
Staff and IT personnel are encouraged to work collaboratively on the project.
|
|
|
|
Technology advisory committee
|
|
A technology advisory committee exists, is informed, and provides input to the implementation
|
|
|
|
Stakeholder input to technology planning
|
|
Wide stakeholder input was sought for the technology implementation - students, faculty, staff
|
|
|
|
|
Established Practices
|
Condition Met
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
0
|
|
Sponsor in charge of the technology
|
|
The sponsor refines existing practices during and after implementations to improve implementations
|
|
|
|
A valid need for the technology and/or a demonstrated fit for purpose
|
|
There is evidence of a valid need for the technology - a problem is being solved
|
|
|
|
Technology advisory committee with broad representation
|
|
The technology advisory committee is representative of the college constituents
|
|
|
|
Executive leadership support
|
|
Executive leadership is always involved in technology implementations to ensure strategic alignment
|
|
|
|
End user testing of product functions and features
|
|
End user testing is a routine part of technology implementations
|
|
|
|
ADA compliance of the technology
|
|
ADA compliance reviews are a routine part of technology implementations
|
|
|
|
Security compliance
|
|
Security compliance reviews are a routine part of technology implementations
|
|
|
|
Project management
|
|
Project management practices are continually tested and refined
|
|
|
Ancillary Considerations Score
|
0
|
|
|
Total Score
|
0
|